|
10 QUESTIONS FOR AMERICAN
BUDDHIST TEACHER
Have
I ever been romantically involved with anyone who is or was my
student or teacher?
Romantic
involvements between teacher and student are not only unethical and
potentially exploitative but also may be
illegal for anyone in the “teacher’s” role.
Romantic relationship with a student discredits a teacher, compromises
the student training and,
ultimately, may turn out to be detrimental not only to the student but also
to the Buddhist Sangha at large.
Do I
control access to any of the Sangha resources?
Teachers
who de facto own / control access to Sangha resources but deny actually
“owning” anything, not only violate the vows of poverty and
simplicity but may also be misrepresenting facts. Since control/access
often substitute for “ownership” (an old IRS trick), playing the
semantics of “ownership” compromises
teacher’s credibility and integrity.
Is my
house / room more luxurious than residents’ in "my" Center / Monastery
/ Temple?
A
teacher who claims to need / deserve more comfort / privacy than others,
not only demeans others, but also violates the vow of simplicity, which,
if claimed or preached, needs to be observed by ALL members of the
Sangha.
Is it
expected of people / students to prostrate in front of me in any
setting?
Prostrations,
(otherwise a recommended solitary practice) IF expected but NOT
reciprocated by teacher, are superfluous and potentially
detrimental. Students' prostrations should be optional.
Do I
allow others perform Sangha household chores for me?
Teacher who shuns / avoids seemingly mundane and simple tasks, or
agrees to have others to perform them instead, contradicts and
misrepresents not only the vow of service but the spirit of the Buddhist
teachings and may be engaging in exploitation of students.
Has
"my" group of students ever been described or referred to as a
“cult”?
There
are innumerable psychologically / spiritually vulnerable persons who
look for a “guru” or “spiritual teacher”. Many of them end up
“brainwashed” and exploited by quasi-religious groups. Any
organization that attempts to limit voluntary exit / departure of its
members, uses psychological pressure to maintain membership /
attendance, utilizes / benefits from free labor of its members or insists on
collecting fees for spiritual teachings should be carefully evaluated
before joining.
Have
I ever been described or referred to as “controlling”,
“authoritarian”, “exploitative”, “dogmatic”, “deceitful”
or “manipulative”?
Teachers with unresolved issues around power
and intimacy, often develop a reputation for being
“controlling” as they confuse the need for self-imposed discipline
necessary in everyone’s spiritual development with teacher-imposed
control of students behavior. Teachers who control key decisions in the Sangha may be perceived as exploiting others in the name of spiritual
guidance.
Do I
eat meat, smoke, drink or use any drugs or mind altering substances?
Vegetarianism
has been historically not only a natural prerequisite for any authentic
and actualized spiritual realization but also its natural and direct manifestation.
Meat consumption, quite acceptable in many groups and the society at
large, compromises spiritual life. Individuals
unable to refrain from eating meat
should continue and deepen their own practice before assuming the
role of a "Buddhist teacher" for others. Individuals
routinely using and / or addicted to any mind altering substances should seek
psychological help.
Am I
exempt from any rules observed in "my" Sangha?
Power
tends to corrupt people, groups and organizations. It is important to make sure
that all members of the Sangha actually follow the same code of rules
and expectations. Teachers who exempt themselves from what is typically
demanded of others not only may loose the trust and devotion of
their students but also may be perceived as “oppressive”,
“unfair” or “exploitative”.
Am I
qualified to teach?
It
is important to question thoroughly teacher’s qualifications and
capacity / ability to teach students at their level of understanding. Teachers
who become defensive or threatened by it, do not understand or avoid
the question, or criticize one for questioning may not be ready to
teach at this time and one should move on. |